Publisher's Synopsis
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1906 edition. Excerpt: ...in attachment cases. We apprehend, however, that no classes of citizens are thus created or favored; rather, the legislature has seen fit to regulate according to a plan of its own, the various methods by which the rulings of justices of the peace in a certain class of cases, and in certain contingencies may be reviewed. As the right to have any judgment or order reviewed, either on error or by appeal is wholly a statutory right, there can be no constitutional objection to the method provided therefor in attachment cases, by the statute under consideration. Judgment affirmed. Marvin and Henry, JJ., concur. Lorain County. MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS--CRIMINAL LAW--RECORD--EVIDENCE. Lorain (8th) Clrclilt Court, May 8, 1905. Marvin, Winch and Henry, JJ. CARL Escn v. ELYRIA (CITY). 1. COUNCIL MAY MAKE NOISY Coxuucr, I-ITC., A PENAL OFFENSE uxoaa LAN. R, L. 3102 (B. 1586-100). A municipal council has authority, under favor of Lan. R. L. 3102 (B. 1536 100), to pass an ordinance making it a penal offense for a person to conduct himself in a noisy, rude, insulting and disorderly manner by words and acts towards another, and in such manner as to annoy the citizens and disturb the good order and quiet of the municipality. Z. Mnon TAKES JUDICIAL NOTICE or OBDINANClJS--RULE WITH RESPECT T0 Counrs or RECORD. The mayor of a municipal corporation is bound to take judicial notice of the city ordinances, but the courts of record are not so bound. The latter courts only take notice of such enactments when they are incorporated into the bill of exceptions and made a DB-rt of the record. A revewing court will presume that the mayor did not err in finding that the council had passed a penal ordinance, when it appears that it was within its power to pass an...