Publisher's Synopsis
This report compares the performance of two models of trailing vortex evolution for which interaction with the ground is not a significant factor. One model uses eddy dissipation rate (EDR) and the other uses the kinetic energy of turbulence fluctuations (TKE) to represent the effect of turbulence. In other respects, the models are nearly identical. The models are evaluated by comparing their predictions of circulation decay, vertical descent, and lateral transport to observations for over four hundred cases from Memphis and Dallas/Fort Worth International Airports. These observations were obtained during deployments in support of NASA's Aircraft Vortex Spacing System (AVOSS). The results of the comparisons show that the EDR model usually performs slightly better than the TKE model.Robins, R. E. and Delisi, D. P. and Hinton, David (Technical Monitor)Langley Research CenterALGORITHMS; KINETIC ENERGY; TURBULENCE MODELS; AIRCRAFT APPROACH SPACING; WING TIP VORTICES; AIRCRAFT WAKES; EVALUATION...
