Publisher's Synopsis
"He that answereth a matter before he heareth it, it is folly and shame unto him." - Proverbs 18:13
The Birth Narratives from the Gospels of Matthew and Luke are written ambiguously enough to be interpreted as a virgin birth by Rome, but interpreted as a natural birth by the early church, which was primarily Jewish.
It's possible the Birth Narratives are written with intentional ambiguity in order to delude Rome into believing Jesus was virgin birthed, so this biological son of David on his father's side, through King Solomon, would appear to be a non-threat to the Roman emperors, paving the way for Rome to acknowledge the Davidic throne as supreme.
All the while, those same Birth Narratives, under closer scrutiny by future Jewish authorities, and read in context of Jewish Law, could be interpreted to be describing Jesus as the biological son of Joseph, which was the type of relationship to King David and to King Solomon which the Jews were looking for in a messiah.
Jesus' Biological Father was Joseph: According to the New Testament reveals the early church beliefs about Jesus, exposing the Roman additions to the authentic Gospel text.
