Publisher's Synopsis
This book lists more than twenty simple but fatal mistakes of contemporary cosmologies. Here are a few: The light cone that was customized for relativity theory, told us only one thing: any event just happened can be represented by a point. So that if there is event happen, we can draw a point to represent. And then draw the future light cone from this point and say: your future will be in it (But who can know the future); and then draw a past light cone: the light of this event will spread to the past. (How? Does it need time travel?) Hawking in his "The Brief History of Time" described the light cone with popular language and several page space. Reader who read the book please think: such a simple mistake, how you did not find? The classical physical theory of blasting considers that the farther away from the explosion center, the slower the expansion of explosives; The theory of the Big Bang says that the farther away from the explosion center, the faster the expansion of explosives. An ancient star from 2000 light years destroyed at 500 years ago. If humans started observe the star from 300 years ago, they could continue to observe for 1500 years and did not know that the observing star was no longer present. All of the stars can not be sure which one is a real celestial body, and which one only a bunch of light. If the fact the "moving meter rulers become shorter" is true, mankind will never have the hope of exploring the universe at high speed. 100 meters long spacecraft in the 0.9 light speed, will become only 44 meters long, the spacecraft clashed already. NASA official website of the Big Bang gives two theoretical supporting pillars have fundamental conflictions between each other. In general relativity theory curved space-time depends on the mass of the celestial body and exists in the space near the celestial body. All celestial bodies must be included into this model; However, there is no evenly distributed 2.7k microwave in the space near the luminescent celestial bodies. The microwave whole sky map cannot incorporate the celestial bodies into the model. Mr. Einstein's theory of relativity is derived by comparing the mutual movement of two inertial systems. However, two inertial moving systems, such as two elevators or two trains, how can they be relative? Screwed them together, or stick with glue?... cannot think out of any means to make them relative. People can only from the subjective identification put the two moving systems relative, respectively, measured. They are always completely independent of each other. So suddenly found: In Mr. Einstein's theory of relativity, the two moving systems can only be made to be relative by pure thinking. How can the pure idea make the "moving meters shorter" and "moving clocks slower"? The CMR calculations in the astronomy about the nebula crash and galaxies merge are all wrong. Astronomers saw the collision of Abell 754 that is located 770 million light years away, generated the 300 million-year-old new galaxies...... The book also explores interesting questions such as the following: The concept of Hidden Celestial Objects is more reasonable than the concept of Dark Matter; The critical point to solve the Olbers' Paradox is the important role of distance and the uneven distribution of celestial bodies; to explain the theory of celestial redshift should consider the observation instruments; star light be deflected while by passing the Sun, but if the Sun is replaced by gravityless opaque cardboard ball, the star light will be still deflected; things only exist at the "present" moment; the new definitions of the space and the time, the new view of the universe ...... Why do aliens not interact with humans? This is a different book with enlightening ideas, starting from the simple, to crash the confusing complex. The main points of this book are based on the scientific papers published by the author.