Publisher's Synopsis
A sobering edited volume on how efforts to reduce nuclear weapons dangers may sometimes wind up exacerbating them.
The existential risks posed to the world by nuclear weapons are growing. Efforts to halt nuclear proliferation, manage crises, promote arms control, and build alliances are all considered fundamental to reducing the likelihood of nuclear catastrophe. Yet, no tool is guaranteed to succeed and some may even have unanticipated, counterproductive consequences for international security.
In a field fixated on finding solutions, Atomic Backfires, edited by Stephen Herzog, Giles David Arceneaux, and Ariel Petrovics, provocatively takes the opposite tack. An impressive group of contributors calls for close scrutiny of "standard operating procedures" in nuclear politics. They warn decision-makers, scholars, and students not to lose sight of the drivers and often calamitous effects of failed nuclear policies. The volume's authors aim to provide insights for navigating the difficult nuclear choices pursued in Washington, D.C. and other capitals around the globe.
