Publisher's Synopsis
A Brief Look Into The Book: The book ASYMMETRIC BEHAVIOR is divided into two parts. The first part is a brief, lyrical philosophical account of human existence and action. The relationship of language or names to formulas and mathematics is shown and the important role that a pseudo language plays in human existence. Because, since words cannot be concretized and therefore cannot designate something concrete in connection with each other, you need ordered, truthful word codes when systematizing socialities, so that a free development of human existence in a socially political system is possible at all. The second part deals with the area of the world formula x high x= 2. The starting point and fulcrum of this scientifically poetic essay are symmetry and especially asymmetry. This essay is an attempt to build a theoretical model by describing the complex physical events involved due to their asymmetric functionality and location in relation to each other in space-time with reference to the meta-time. On the other hand, classical physics offers a standard model in which little importance is attached to asymmetry, but can also be attached to it, since here we are not talking about deviations but about fixed principles, i.e. symmetry is understood as a means and an end. But classical physics was dethroned by modern physics and metaphysics. The beginning of modern physics is nothing more than the fact that physicists are more intensively concerned with ancient and religious writings and have built up a science that cannot be refuted - at least today. I.e. the consideration of asymmetry because of its dualistic aspect is not only indispensable for the explanation of physics today but also necessary. With the co-calculation of asymmetry alone, topics of physics such as dynamics, mechanics, pressure or gravity can be problematized as a fact and made available for the benefit of mankind. This book is a creative representation of this above physical science. Creativity and religion came to the fore with many new physicists as well as with the physicist Werner Heisenberg. His pupil Hans Peter Dürr jokingly said in this matter that one should be grateful that Heisenberg did not understand much about formulas.
