Publisher's Synopsis
INTRODUCTION This thesis is explicitly advancing Richard Rorty's political philosophy, which has been characterized as 'Liberalism'. Richard Rorty's liberalism is completely separated from all forms of 'authoritarianism' on both levels, religious and secular. Richard Rorty rejects the idea that there are principles without question (undoubted) that exist independently of, and this form is called 'anti-foundationalism' and Richard Rorty's Political Philosophy is a form of this anti-foundationalism. So, according to Rorty, there are no foundations and justifications for our everyday social and political practices. Moreover, he intentionally suggests that it should be considered for a particular purpose or that his descriptions entail logically the anti-thesis of ethical commitment and the justification of moral practices. It is afar broadly captivated that in advancing 'anti-foundationalism' There are some other arguments that just to correspond to the standards of a community i.e., especially, a narrowly conceived community. Rorty reduces commitment to biased concerns and justification. Richard Rorty's anti-foundationalism is captivated to give up outdated any normative project in Political theory, justification, and commitment. It is a matter of: "the way we happen to do things around here' or 'merely what we happen to think around here". (Kelly, 2000) This thesis is advancing Rorty's actual position, by arguing that the misunderstandings captured in them give a different and outfit appearance to Rorty. In this thesis, there are main claims that are; Rorty's anti-foundationalism does not fall into a limited or narrow outlook, because one of Rorty's political goals is achieving 'solidarity' within his own nation and within the all communities in the world. And.
