Are the Humanities Inconsequent?

Are the Humanities Inconsequent? Interpreting Marx's Riddle of the Dog - Paradigm

Paperback (18 Sep 2009)

Not available for sale

Includes delivery to the United States

Out of stock

This service is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Publisher's Synopsis

Adapting the discontinuous and multi-tonal critical procedures of works like Carlyle's Sartor Resartus and Laura Riding's Anarchism Is Not Enough, Jerome McGann subjects current literary studies to a patacritical investigation. The investigation centers in the interpretation of a notorious modern riddle: "Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read." Working by indirection and from multiple points of view, the book argues that aesthetics is always a science of exceptions, and that any given critical practice is also always an exception from itself. The book works from two assumptions: first, that the riddle of the dog conceals an allegory about book culture and is addressed to the academic custodians of book culture; and second, that any  explanation of the riddle is necessarily implicated in the problem posed by the riddle. It therefore remains to be seen-it is the reader's part to decide-whether the book is a friend to man or-perhaps like the riddle of the dog-"too dark to read."

Book information

ISBN: 9780979405761
Publisher: Prickly Paradigm Press
Imprint: Prickly Paradigm Press
Pub date:
DEWEY: 801.95
DEWEY edition: 22
Language: English
Number of pages: 96
Weight: 85g
Height: 18mm
Width: 12mm
Spine width: 1mm